Subject: Re: Last remaining insque / remque uses
To: NetBSD tech-kern mailing list <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: David Young <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/24/2007 15:28:45
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:52:32PM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Tom Spindler wrote:
> > > 3 if_eon.c eonrtrequest 269 remque(&el->el_qhdr);
> > Given that many of these pieces of sh^W^W^Wlovely source files
> > don't actually bother using 'struct queue', and far more often
> > monkey around with the affected structures themselves - it might
> > be better to just embed local copies of the routines into the
> > affected sources. (As the defs are all of five lines of code each,
> > I don't think it'd be a horrible burden.)
> 'options EON' brings in the eon code, which accounts for one of these
> usages, patch below. It builds but I can't test it as I have no idea what
> EON is. If it a) looks fine, or b) somebody can test then I'll commit
> (the list is otherwise unused, it could as easily be removed)
> I was looking at the other netiso usages and yeah, that code is gangly..
> how much effort is too much effort for this?
Does anyone use/test/maintain netiso on NetBSD-current? If we cannot
get a maintainer, then I think that we should delete it before 5.0.
David Young OJC Technologies
email@example.com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933 ext 24