Gert Doering wrote:
...
> Indeed, that would be the necessary change.
> 
> I am not following the CVS commit messages - I checked tech-net, didn't
> find anything here, nothing in any of the announcement lists either, so 
> I decided to err on the safe side, and bring it up here.
> 
> What about a pullup to netbsd-3 and netbsd-2?
> 
> gert
> 

Hi,

A pullup for netbsd-3 is in the queue as well (1766).  I'll start
looking into netbsd-2 hopefully over the weekend.  We'll then be
releasing an advisory for the issue documenting the change in behaviour
WRT RH0.

regards,

adrian.