--2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:57:22PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:46:16AM -0800, Bill Stouder-Studenmund wrote:
> > Why? We have GPL in-tree, and AFAICT GPL is worse than CDDL.
>=20
> Is it?
>=20
> I personally can understand GPL - but I am unable to parse even the first
> 10% of CDDL.

My understanding is that CDDL is similar to the GPL in what it says about=
=20
a given file. The main issue, though, is that it ONLY applies to the=20
covered files; it is not viral.

Take care,

Bill

--2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFF8F9gWz+3JHUci9cRAqUQAJwKbnKUti/mBKKlzLd0fSeBXx1McwCbBZMi
dMUb6U7L3dIO+9BKjTb4mqo=
=tIYZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a--