Subject: Re: fast_ipsec code review
To: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jonathan A. Kollasch <email@example.com>
Date: 11/15/2006 13:32:39
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 06:49:12PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> DEGROOTE Arnaud <email@example.com> wrote:
> > ~~~~
> >It would be nice too if some people can test the code in more real =20
> >cases and report success and failure. I can provide a =20
> >GENERIC.FAST_IPSEC if someone needs it.
> >Take cares.
> >PS : Please CC me on reply
> Unfortunately it will be difficult for me to test ipv6 because my provider
> does not use it, but I can definitely check ipv4.
Actually, there are any number of ways to get connectivity to that
Internet, 6to4, a tunnel broker, maybe Teredo. Anyway, you could
always use a RFC 4193 address block.
I should build this and throw it on my test boxes. If only racoon
were a bit more stable for me while using GSSAPI, oh well, there's
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----