Subject: Re: fast_ipsec code review
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 11/15/2006 18:49:12
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
DEGROOTE Arnaud <email@example.com> wrote:
>First news : I have add the support of extension header in fast_ipsec
>so fast_ipsec now can handle correctly any ipv6 packet.
This is great news! I look forward to the whole thing being committed
and dropping the kame ipsec code.
>Now, the support of ipv6 is quite complete. So it would be great if
>some people can review the current code. I have attached a diff
>against current, and you can retrieve all the code in the cvs / cvsweb
>associated with the project (
There are many KNF issues with the code as far as indentation and white-space
is concerned, but they should be easily fixable. Also at this point the
code should use ansi prototypes...
>It would be nice too if some people can test the code in more real
>cases and report success and failure. I can provide a
>GENERIC.FAST_IPSEC if someone needs it.
>PS : Please CC me on reply
Unfortunately it will be difficult for me to test ipv6 because my provider
does not use it, but I can definitely check ipv4.