Subject: Re: How to use properly ipv6 autoconf over a router interface?
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: Thomas E. Spanjaard <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/04/2006 22:06:16
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Thu, 4 May 2006, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>> RSIP is a form of NAT. It's cleaner and better than traditional NAT, but
>> it is NAT-like. Also note that the protocols are experimental, not
>> standards track. I don't think anyone has tried to use them with v6.
> Indeed, the IESG note at the top of RFC 3102 looks scary enough not to
> go too near
As I said before, why not just layer2 bridge and have the cellphone and
wireless fridge sollicitate the real router? If I'm not mistaken this is
how Windows XP likes to work as well (at least as far as
ethernet+firewire interfaces are concerned, I think it bridges them
automatically when configuring a network using the wizard).
Thomas E. Spanjaard
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----