This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig2439300C70420E499345FF8F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

David Young wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:06:25AM -0700, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
>  =20
>> In general, avoid re(4) like the plague.  They _are_ cheap, though, an=
d
>> they'll work in a pinch.  sk(4) seems to work pretty well for me, and
>>    =20
>
> What is wrong with re(4)?
>
> Dave
>
>  =20
I've had various problems with them - the one I can recall offhand is
claiming to support an MTU of 9000, while I was only ever able to get
them to pass about 7000 bytes.  That said, I have a desktop machine in
which re(4) is the main card, and it seems to work well enough for a
light load.

+j



--------------enig2439300C70420E499345FF8F
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRE5HpLOuUtxCgar5AQMkqwP+PZ7rQJ2GOE29GQTp9DiLHBxYfZkRczg7
74AAXt2w4QskrokUosqKBCOMNizHUmbb4/debxcKLNsTP9atVDzsgs4rMQCTLSbi
zkMN/7egX7i/8Mj0V1ysnERSo3I2gViDSIXqF+/fNBdC0jdVtOczLtsvn/EraSL+
1whNR7DSwsw=
=gOB9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig2439300C70420E499345FF8F--