Subject: Re: low-cost Gigabit card recommendations?
To: Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org>
From: Jeff Rizzo <riz@NetBSD.org>
Date: 04/25/2006 00:06:25
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Thomas Klausner wrote:
> I'm looking for low-cost Gigabit network cards.
> >From currently available models, it seems the following are
> low-cost and supported:
> Belkin Gigabit Desktop sk(4)
> D-Link DGE-528T re(4)
> D-Link DGE-530T sk(4)
I have one of these. Seems to work OK.
> D-Link DGE-550T stge(4)
> Linksys EG1032v2 sk(4)
> [How do I recognize v2 before buying?]
You probably don't, unless the box says something. (Yay, vendors) v3 (I
have one of these) should be supported by re(4).
> Netgear GA311 re(4)
> SMC 9452TX gsip(4)
> ZyXEL GN-650T vge(4)
I have the ZyXEL as well - haven't pushed it, but it's the cheapest
64-bit card I found.
> Which one of these would you recommend and why?
> Some other low-cost models that I didn't find in man pages are:
> Intel PRO/1000 GT Desktop Adapter (PWLA8391GT) wm?
> Intel PRO/1000 PT Desktop Adapter (EXPI9300PT) wm?
Yes, these are probably wm.
> US Robotics Gigabit Ethernet Card
I have one of these, it's a re(4).
> Are any of these supported too, or could be easily supported,
> and would be preferable?
In general, avoid re(4) like the plague. They _are_ cheap, though, and
they'll work in a pinch. sk(4) seems to work pretty well for me, and
wm(4) is ok since Jason fixed the jumbo frames problem, though there
seems to be a number of boards that _should_ work with wm that don't. =20
I don't have any experience with gsip(4) or stge(4).
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----