This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigBD15E661C73A2A63DE20FFA6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dave Huang wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:56:58AM -0800, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
>  =20
>>> for ipf and pf.
>>>  =20
>>>      =20
>> No, this is entirely orthogonal to pf+altq.  I have some interest in i=
t,
>> but AFAIK no actual work is being done on a new altq api at the presen=
t
>> time.=20
>>    =20
>
> While a new API would be nice, I'd be happy with a working patch for
> -current. The one at http://nedbsd.nl/~ppostma/pf/altq.html no longer
> applies cleanly. I don't suppose anyone has a newer version of that pat=
ch
> that does apply?
>  =20

My experience with the patches under 3.0_STABLE (applied cleanly, does
not put packets in the expected queues - took me quite a while to figure
out even that much) leads me to believe that effort is probably better
spent elsewhere...

+j



--------------enigBD15E661C73A2A63DE20FFA6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBQ/kzjrOuUtxCgar5AQO6ewQArFexne4M46mB4b6G1d6AddF258ks7zUU
UqGEEv1HPUe9UjjzD0egUvZVSO6NRV0hXbMBCkraxv9Z/0dK2eyz5U4XZqYTqaP7
wUopH9uy62cUsf64taSf55L9QPyVQJZjiBRRjgXqiVqse+x+wVbxv8TKxqY5QIx0
ktTRCNf7IDk=
=45Ke
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigBD15E661C73A2A63DE20FFA6--