Subject: Re: new altq API (was Re: Changing the PHY status reporting)
To: Dave Huang <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jeff Rizzo <riz@NetBSD.org>
Date: 02/19/2006 19:12:10
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Dave Huang wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:56:58AM -0800, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
>>> for ipf and pf.
>> No, this is entirely orthogonal to pf+altq. I have some interest in i=
>> but AFAIK no actual work is being done on a new altq api at the presen=
> While a new API would be nice, I'd be happy with a working patch for
> -current. The one at http://nedbsd.nl/~ppostma/pf/altq.html no longer
> applies cleanly. I don't suppose anyone has a newer version of that pat=
> that does apply?
My experience with the patches under 3.0_STABLE (applied cleanly, does
not put packets in the expected queues - took me quite a while to figure
out even that much) leads me to believe that effort is probably better
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----