joerg@britannica.bec.de wrote:
> Ieek. I don't like that patch. I'll work on something better at least
> for PF based on what I did for DragonFly. I can't promise anything about
> IPF though.

I think there should be more intercommunication between NetBSD
and DragonFly, FreeBSD and OpenBSD (if they accept this). IMO, core@
should talk with KAME developers and *BSD projects about API and finally
decide what to do with PF +ALTQ implementation. We're not moving with
this many years... and I believe that new-ALTQ shaping is interesting
for our community.

-- 
Sincerly,
Mindaugas