Subject: Re: Changing the PHY status reporting
To: Brad <email@example.com>
From: Pavel Cahyna <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/19/2006 20:46:35
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 06:46:23PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 03:34:27PM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
> > No, I'm not confusing anything. I'm well aware that VRRP violates
> > Cisco's patent. However, Cisco has publicly stated that they will not
> > prosecute anybody implementing it. However, to my knowledge, they have
> > not made any comments about CARP. So, my question stands: de we know
> > if CARP violates Cisco's patent?
> No, CARP does not violate Cisco's patent. It was designed specifically
> so it does not.
Any pointers to an analysis which would convince everybody?