Subject: Re: Changing the PHY status reporting
To: None <>
From: None <>
List: tech-net
Date: 02/19/2006 20:14:27
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 08:58:58PM +0200, Mihai CHELARU wrote:
> <> wrote in message 
> news:<>...
> >Doesn't answer the question which protocol number should be
> >used instead. Any suggestions?
> 253 or 254 (RFC3692 s2.1) ?

"Shipping a product with a specific value pre-enabled would be
inappropriate and can lead to interoperability problems when the
chosen value collides with a different usage, as it someday surely will."

aka: it is not really better than the status quo.