Subject: Re: connection bonding?
To: David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Matt Thomas <email@example.com>
Date: 12/09/2005 05:33:23
David Laight wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:38:22PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
>>Other protocols are even worse, IBM SNA usually aborts session
>>immediately if packets are lost (and reordering is counted as
> The ISO protocols (eg class 4 transport over LLC1, and LLC2 itself)
> require that the network not duplicate nor re-order packets.
CLNS (over LLC1) doesn't care about duplicate or reordered paclets.
CONS (over LLC2) *does* care about duplicate or reordered packets.
TP4 will gracefully handle network lossage, but then it typically runs over
CLNS. TP2 or TP0 won't since they run over CONS.
> Lost packets should be ok.
Matt Thomas email: firstname.lastname@example.org
3am Software Foundry www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.