Subject: Re: connection bonding?
To: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 12/07/2005 12:29:46
In message <Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Hubert Feyrer writes:
>On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, David Young wrote:
>> I believe you want agr(4), "link aggregation pseudo network interface
>I wonder if the keyword "bond" or "bonding" can be added to both the agr.4
I understand where you're coming from but I think it's a lost cause.
Some vendors use the marketing term "bonding". Cisco (the giant in
that market) uses EtherChannel or Gigabit Etherchannel. Other vendors
Now that IEEE-802 has defined a standard, lets stick with the IEEE
name: link aggregation.
(I regret we didn't call the driver "link_aggr" or "linkag", but
then that's my own taste.)