Subject: Re: State of "jumbo frames" support?
To: None <tech-net@NetBSD.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 11/28/2005 05:37:36
>> Before I beat my head against this too much more, I thought I should
>> ask here - what's the word on "jumbo frames" support in NetBSD?
> Jumbo frames are a non-standard. Ergo, support for "jumbo frames"
> depends on the vagaries of individual hardware chips; sometimes even
> on variants within a family. Therefore it doesn' tmake sense to ask
> about "jumbo frame" support in NetBSD, other than on a
> device-by-device (or chip-variant by chip-variant) level.
I would disagree. For example, does if_ethersubr.c correctly handle
jumbograms? Does bpf? tcpdump? There are lots of pieces of common,
hardware-independent, code that might or might not handle really large
packets correctly, and it makes sense to ask how widespread that
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML firstname.lastname@example.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B