Subject: Re: ral(4) / ural(4) in NetBSD 2.1 or 3.0 ?
To: iMil <imil@home.imil.net>
From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 08/24/2005 20:56:13
--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2005.08.24 21:44:38 +0000, iMil wrote:
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
| Hash: SHA1
|=20
|=20
| >I can borrow an USB ASUS card from someone to test the driver.  If it
| >(somewhat) works, I'll buy one or two and can do all the testing you wan=
t.
| >:-)
|=20
| funny, i bought an USB Asus card 2 weeks ago and already ported Naoki=20
| FUKAUMI ural(4) driver to NetBSD 3.0 because my pccard slot stopped=20
| working :) see http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-net/2005/08/14/0001.html=
=20
| for details. Anyway, it seems like very little patching is needed on=20
| Naoki's ral(4) port to make it run on NetBSD 3.0, from what i saw only th=
e=20
| card definition is missing.

Why not port ural/ral from NetBSD-current to NetBSD 3.0 ? That's much more
easier and I can give it a try if anyone is willing to do some testing.
I don't have any ral/ural cards/dongles.

		-- Rui Paulo

--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDDNDdZPqyxs9FH4QRApmOAJ9yNqNM4VCc7KHZhf8rJvfpZKWesgCfWYAI
sofSFNF1TKd57xN5ynRnJj4=
=4UqN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx--