Subject: Re: Uncommon routing arrangement
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-net
Date: 02/17/2005 18:14:39
--VbfcI4OLZ4XW0yH2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:27:52AM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
> It means rebooting the gateway to change almost anything about it (I
> had to hack on various bits of the arp support to make it work at
> all, and I can't take down some of the things once they're set up).

I'm not sure why this should have been necessary, what was the
behaviour you had to change?  (or was the fake gateway address you
added not part of the subnet?)

--
Dan.
--VbfcI4OLZ4XW0yH2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCFERfEAVxvV4N66cRAlKBAKCC8SOAwx+w/WbE6q25jQYbK8Gg6gCgtJYR
J8mAjKLuUI3wUHZWr3jI2W8=
=Wdvy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VbfcI4OLZ4XW0yH2--