Subject: Re: IP-in-TCP?
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-net
Date: 02/02/2005 17:18:38
--j+MD90OnwjQyWNYt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 04:41:57PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> Such a system will end up duplicating 'lost' packets most of the time,
> but as long as you have more open tunnel streams than real ones (or
> more tunnel streams than packets lost, scaled by some factor), the
> inner TCPs shouldn't get stuck behind outer TCP recovery.

Actually, I think the phrase I was looking for should be "more open
tunnel streams than tunnelled packets in flight".

--
Dan.
--j+MD90OnwjQyWNYt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCAHC+EAVxvV4N66cRAjqrAKCIb5C8dGhKkLpCvEj9ZUGQlYPiZwCfbnkW
QmUaJ+55yZGl1+GOGbWOebU=
=T1iC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--j+MD90OnwjQyWNYt--