Subject: Re: generic v6-v4 tunnel / packet scheduling issue (was: Re: IPv6 over GRE tunneling?)
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Gert Doering <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/29/2005 00:14:30
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 09:29:06PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> After comparing the gif/gre sources for a number of hours, to see whether
> GRE does something differently than GIF, I decided to actually test it
> with GIF. The problem is the same! (Sparc64, NetBSD-current as of Jan 27).
Michael v. Elst has done some more tests, and the results seem to point
at "it's specific to Sparc64, but not to -current" (reproduction on
NetBSD/i386-1.6.2 and NetBSD/amiga-2.0 was not possible, but as soon
as one tunnel end is NetBSD/sparc64, timings start being weird).
I've repeated my tests with Sparc64/2.0.1 (same tunnel setup), and the
result is the same - ping across the tunnel has weird timings.
This is how things look if I ping from NetBSD:
16 bytes from 2001:608:4:5555::1, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=1005.55 ms
16 bytes from 2001:608:4:5555::1, icmp_seq=1 hlim=64 time=6.067 ms
16 bytes from 2001:608:4:5555::1, icmp_seq=2 hlim=64 time=491.48 ms
16 bytes from 2001:608:4:5555::1, icmp_seq=3 hlim=64 time=466.519 ms
16 bytes from 2001:608:4:5555::1, icmp_seq=4 hlim=64 time=464.901 ms
16 bytes from 2001:608:4:5555::1, icmp_seq=5 hlim=64 time=1005.23 ms
16 bytes from 2001:608:4:5555::1, icmp_seq=6 hlim=64 time=5.414 ms
and this is ping from Cisco:
cisco2514#ping 2001:608:4:5555::2 repeat 5
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2001:608:4:5555::2, timeout is 2 seconds:
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 56/536/992 ms
PS: the NetBSD tunnel configuration I've posted has IPv6 and IPv4 addresses
configured as "inside" addresses. The IPv4 address is a testing leftover,
and is not relevant. Effect stays the same with IPv6 only.
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany email@example.com
fax: +49-89-35655025 firstname.lastname@example.org