Subject: Re: Some discussion of NewReno implementation issues
To: Charles M. Hannum <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 01/26/2005 17:05:35
On Jan 26, 2005, at 4:29 PM, Charles M. Hannum wrote:
> As such, given that the performance appears to have been brought back
> in line
> with Reno, I am not inclined to touch it again unless I see hard
> numbers to
> demonstrate that another variant is better.
What about enabling the fixed NewReno as the default?