Subject: Re: down interfaces, link detection, and connected routes
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Miles Nordin <carton@Ivy.NET>
Date: 01/19/2005 17:59:47
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>>>>> "js" == Jonathan Stone <email@example.com> writes:
js> Thinking about laptops here, I really, *really* don't want to
js> lose my TCP connections if TCP generates an ACK or retransmit
well, you shouldn't. an ICMP unreachable should not tear down an
established TCP session, and that is I think correct now, although
sometimes the timeouts seem to become pretty short. I forget where I
was discussing this before---probably here, w.r.t. Fernando's draft?
so yeah, I was just saying ``be careful not to accidentally replicate
MS brokenness''. I think on NetBSD we are safe from that for
everything in this discussion.
Gun registration is, not what sex is about.
-- party guest
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----