Subject: Re: TCP/SACK support.
To: Jonathan Stone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Perry E. Metzger <email@example.com>
Date: 01/06/2005 18:23:43
Jonathan Stone <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> In message <email@example.com>,
> "Perry E. Metzger" writes:
>>Jonathan Stone <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>> But there are a number of other implementations of SACK for the BSD
>>> TCP stack, some of which have been widely tested, deployed, and not
>>> least, had some review by leading members TCP/IP research community.
>>SACK is not like slow start or what have you -- it doesn't need
>>careful tuning and there aren't subtle bugs you can introduce in
> Nope. For starters, you should re-read the message Pavel already
I understand SACK already, Jonathan, but thanks for the concern.