Subject: Re: weird ipnat problem (on ancient 1.4U)
To: Daniel Carosone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Herb Peyerl <email@example.com>
Date: 01/06/2005 15:41:33
On 6-Jan-05, at 3:34 PM, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> Unless its some kind of worm, my guess might involve the words firefox
> and pipelining, and the number 1.0. Except I'd kind of expect that to
> have the opposite effect, and plus your webserver would have to
> support it too.
I wouldn't expect that Firefox would have any sort of significant
impact on the world as far as webservers goes... At least not
> You haven't updated or changed the NAT/firewall, but has someone
> updated the website? Perhaps scattered lots more small images on it
> or something?
Not that I know of but it's a good point... I assume 64k is a hard
limit for NAT entries...