Subject: Re: M_READONLY
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 09/20/2004 20:17:49
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Sep 20, 2004, at 6:05 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> my point is, there's no reason to make all external storage read-only.
> what you need is M_EXT_READONLY i mentioned in another mail (or
> i didn't include it in the patch just because currently there's no code
> which need it in tree (afaik).
Sure. But "external storage is read-only unless M_CLUSTER" has been
part of our mbuf API for some time now, and 3rd parties have written
code that assumes this. So, "writable non-cluster external storage"
needs to have an explicit flag to maintain compatibility.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----