Subject: Re: M_READONLY
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 09/20/2004 17:51:14
--Apple-Mail-13--690926227
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed


On Sep 20, 2004, at 3:07 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

> should M_EXT_RW be set for M_CLUSTER mbufs as well?

Yes.

> although i prefer M_EXT_READONLY because the most of mbufs are R/W,
> M_EXT_RW is also ok for me.

I suggested the "explicitly mark it RW" because the "implicit RO" 
behavior has been around for a fairly long time, and there is external 
code that depends on it, almost certainly.

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>


--Apple-Mail-13--690926227
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
	name=PGP.sig
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)

iD4DBQFBT3sCOpVKkaBm8XkRAkcgAJ41R/VClkgxLbuguGM96+9JXiksbgCUCgQo
OhxLipymOCopX7FGGGAjMg==
=g5KA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail-13--690926227--