Subject: Re: Alternative approach for interface events
To: None <tech-net@NetBSD.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <email@example.com>
Date: 09/19/2004 21:00:02
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 12:56:29PM +0200, Peter Postma wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 08:42:20PM +1000, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 12:31:56PM +0200, Peter Postma wrote:
> > > I'm not really happy with the changes to pfil(9) to support interface
> > > events (attach, detach, addresses).=20
> > Doesn't the routing socket already advertise these kinds of changes?
> Sorry, no idea, I'm not familiar with that code...
It does, but of course you're talking about notification events within
the kernel. Never mind me.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----