Subject: Re: Alternative approach for interface events
To: None <tech-net@NetBSD.org>
From: Peter Postma <email@example.com>
Date: 09/19/2004 12:56:29
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 08:42:20PM +1000, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 12:31:56PM +0200, Peter Postma wrote:
> > I'm not really happy with the changes to pfil(9) to support interface
> > events (attach, detach, addresses).
> Doesn't the routing socket already advertise these kinds of changes?
Sorry, no idea, I'm not familiar with that code...