Subject: Re: looking for if_wi_usb porting strategy suggestions
To: Jon Warner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 09/15/2004 15:32:09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Sep 15, 2004, at 2:03 PM, Jon Warner wrote:
> I've ported if_wi_usb.c to NetBSD but I did it by bringing OpenBSD's
> wi.c with it, which in hindsight seems like a very wrong thing to do.
> I'd like to redo things using NetBSD's wi.c and net80211 framework.
> I'd like suggestions from you folks more familiar with NetBSD as to
> how to do this. The OpenBSD implementation uses a set of function
> pointers to allow wi.c to use BUS specific I/O functions. Would
> working a framework like this into wi.c make sense?
Sounds like it's required, so "yes" :-)
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----