Jeff and all

I would also contribute a few more pints of beer to this cause.....


Regards

M

Jeff Rizzo wrote:
> 
> So, last summer (Late May) there was some discussion about RFC 2385
> support ("Protection of BGP Sessions via the TCP MD5 Signature") which
> had been written but not committed due to lack of time on the part
> of the developer(s) who had written it.  Is there someone I can buy a
> beer or two to persuade to revisit this?  :)  It would be nice to
> be able to continue to use NetBSD for BGP applications now that many
> peers are demanding MD5 session authentication...
> 
> Yes, IPSec would be more appropriate, but since the 500lb gorilla
> supports this way...
> 
> Thanks!
> +j
> 
> --
> Jeff Rizzo                                         http://boogers.sf.ca.us/~riz