Subject: Re: sendto(2) EINVAL / pacing problem
To: None <>
From: Christoph Kaegi <>
List: tech-net
Date: 02/11/2004 12:58:45
On 11.02-06:32, der Mouse wrote:
> That was one of the things that puzzled me about the original message,
> but it appeared to me on a careful reading that the problem was not
> with communication with remote machines but rather with a local process
> communicating with a local server, to collect information _about_
> remote machines.
> Reinforcing this was the circumstantial evidence that the code quoted
> used a variable name ending _sau for the sockaddr for sendto().  To me
> that suffix says "sockaddr_un", not "sockaddr_in".  And this message
> clearly stated AF_LOCAL, and while it also clearly stated UDP, the code
> will not say UDP anywhere, whereas it will say AF_LOCAL, so the
> AF_LOCAL is more likely to be right - and getting nothing from
> udp_usrreq debugging seems like confirmation.

Sorry for beeing a little inaccurate. This was/is my first project
involving network programming and being a sysadmin it's not what
I do every day. 

Thanks for your patience...


Christoph Kaegi