Subject: Re: Sample patch for sysctl access to protocol input-queue state
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 09/18/2003 23:04:56
On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 04:09 PM, Jonathan Stone wrote:
> For the record, Jason Thorpe looked at this too, and suggested ifq_*
> names (rather than ifq.*). Jason has been heard, but after
> reflection, I agree with Matt. The point is not code savings or
> reuse, but for uniformity and consistency of the sysctl namespace.
Fine with me.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>