Subject: Re: Reminder that we are supporting two parallel IPsec implementations
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/12/2003 16:39:08
On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 02:30 PM, Jonathan Stone wrote:
> Where's the flaw in Matt Thomas' suggestion?
> That approach seems a much better approach to me, and it doesn't
> involve re-opening the thorny question of the status of kernfs.
There's nothing wrong with Matt's suggestion. It is, in fact, the 100%
correct thing to do.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>