Subject: Re: Reminder that we are supporting two parallel IPsec implementations
To: Jason Thorpe <>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
List: tech-net
Date: 09/12/2003 14:30:21
>That means that kernfs WOULD BE REQUIRED to support large numbers of 
>IPsec SAs.

Where's the flaw in Matt Thomas' suggestion?

That approach seems a much better approach to me, and it doesn't
involve re-opening the thorny question of the status of kernfs.