Subject: Re: Reminder that we are supporting two parallel IPsec implementations
To: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 09/12/2003 14:22:19
On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 12:46 PM, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> As long as kernfs has to be optional, it can never be useful, as
> it can do has to be done another way too. As long as it can never be
> useful, it will always be optional.
Of course, kernfs was never meant to be useful when it was written...
it was written as an example of cool stuff you could do with the new
VFS stuff in 4.4.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>