Subject: Re: Reminder that we are supporting two parallel IPsec
To: None <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <email@example.com>
Date: 09/12/2003 10:01:02
> > the code is identical in sys/netipsec.
> So if it's identical, you would accept demonstrationn of a bug against
> the sys/netipsec code as applicable to the KAME sys/netkey tree?
> If so,, the bug can be demonstrated quite easily[*]. With
> approximately 340 SAs total, setkey starts returning EAGAIN.
nowhere in sys/netkey we return EAGAIN. therefore it's not my problem.
if you still flame me, prove where is the source of EAGAIN.