Subject: Re: Reminder that we are supporting two parallel IPsec implementations
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: None <>
List: tech-net
Date: 09/12/2003 09:37:25
>Itojun, you're not helping yourself. The kindest interpretation of
>your reply is that the PF_KEY wasn't ready to be committed to our tree
>in the first place.

	SADB_DUMP behavior is specwise correct, there's no question about it.
	now stop flaming me and write some code insetad.  be productive.