Subject: Re: Reminder that we are supporting two parallel IPsec
To: None <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <email@example.com>
Date: 09/12/2003 08:47:32
> Anyway ... if we go down that route, then during the transition
> period, changes to the PF_KEY API have to be synchronized across both
> IPsec implementations. Ad-hoc changes to the PF_KEY api (or abi) in
> one will likely break the other.
i remember no ad-hoc changes to PF_KEY API/ABI made to netbsd tree.
which one do you think ad-hoc?
i made changes with reasons. if you call it "ad-hoc" in public it's
quite a insult.