Subject: Re: Reminder that we are supporting two parallel IPsec implementations
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
List: tech-net
Date: 09/11/2003 18:27:29
In message <200309120118.VAA18209@Sparkle.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>der Mouse writes
>> now stop flaming me and write some code insetad.  be productive.
>Pot, meet Kettle.

Not exactly. Two of the items I'm coding on right now are remediating
some recent commits, commits which weren't discussed here; which were
not offered for review prior to commit; and (in one case) went against
the consensus of prior discussion of the technical issue.

What is one supposed to do?  Back out Itojun's changes without discussion?
No way, that's not how we do business.