Subject: Re: PF for netbsd
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/04/2003 12:25:36
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:53:51AM +0900, email@example.com wrote:
> i don't like m_tag_name2tag, because m_tag is used for other purposes.
> the name2tag/tag2name functions are just for PACKET_TAG_PF_TAG tags.
There could be other things that could make use of name2tag/tag2name
functions (altq queues ?).
The m_pftag* functions could be extended to take the queue head as argument,
so they wouldn't be specific to the pf_tags list any more.
The problem is then the declaration of the queue head. For pf_tag,
as there are several independant users, this would this have to be
defined in a common place, probably uipc_mbuf2.c.
Maybe it ins't a that good idea. What do others think ?
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI. Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
NetBSD: 24 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference