Subject: Re: PF for netbsd
To: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 07/03/2003 20:54:22
>> new diff is avaialble, this time includes IPsec-with-PF diff.
>As far as I can tell, qname_to_qid() & all aren't dependant from pf but
>rather from altq. Maybe they should be moved to altq instead ?
kjc will do something about it.
>Also, it seems tagname2tag() & friend is back into pf code, is it
see conversation w/ darrenr. anyways it's back in uipc_mbuf2.c.
>Also there should probably be no
>#if NPF > 0
>in non-pf code (ipsec and altq).
>And really, I'd prefer to have the struct and functions names for the
>m_tag stuff with another prefix than pf. It makes the code much more readable
>when each subsystem's name is properly prefixed, and really confusing when
>the same prefix is used for different subsystems.
"tag" is already used for m_tag, so i guess "pftag" is the best name
i can think of.