Subject: Re: PF for netbsd
To: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
From: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
List: tech-net
Date: 06/29/2003 08:46:28
>> then why not
>> accept the use of something that we have more control over instead 
>> of waiting on the ipf development to integrate a new feature?
>
>I'm not sure what you realy mean, but PF does 100% fail to meet the "more
>control" criteria - which is probably still quite an understatement.

	you can join openbsd project if you would like to participate PF
	development.  there's no rule such as "netbsd developer can't become
	openbsd developer".  i do both, and some others do.

itojun