On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 11:40:33AM +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
> >	i really hope this atmosphere to change.  by working on KAME project 
> >	which is trying to create a good code that benefits all BSDs) i'm
> >	trying to do so.  KAME have made some improvements which needs PF (at
> >	this moment), and i'm asking for permission to commit
> >	PF-for-netbsd-current, as it is too painful to maintain local patch
> >	myself (as said earlier i work on multiple platforms, current and
> >	release w/kame, in parallel).
> 
> 	also note that i'm not the only one who want PF on netbsd.
> 	(including Joel Wilsson)

I am not against PF for NetBSD, as long as it doesn't take the place of IPF.
I'm quite happy with IP Filter, and I personally think ALTQ should be able
to use either. If this requires modifications of the IPF code, well, Darren
should be able to what is needed.

-Sean

-- 
/~\ The ASCII
\ / Ribbon Campaign                   Sean Davis
 X  Against HTML                       aka dive
/ \ Email!