PR 21903.

-seanb

On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:00:47AM -0400, Sean Boudreau wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:21:48PM +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
> > ># ifconfig ex0
> > >ex0: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> > >	capabilities=7<IP4CSUM,TCP4CSUM,UDP4CSUM>
> > >	enabled=0<>
> > >	address: 00:04:75:dc:7e:68
> > >	media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
> > >	status: active
> > >	inet 10.7.0.131 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 10.255.255.255
> > >	inet6 fe80::204:75ff:fedc:7e68%ex0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
> > ># ifconfig gif0
> > >gif0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1280
> > ># netstat -rnfinet
> > >Routing tables
> > >
> > >Internet:
> > >Destination        Gateway            Flags     Refs     Use    Mtu  Interface
> > >10                 link#2             UC          0        0      -  ex0
> > >127                127.0.0.1          UGRS        0        0  33220  lo0
> > >127.0.0.1          127.0.0.1          UH          1        2  33220  lo0
> > ># ifconfig gif0 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2
> > ># netstat -rnfinet
> > >Routing tables
> > >
> > >Internet:
> > >Destination        Gateway            Flags     Refs     Use    Mtu  Interface
> > >10                 link#2             UC          0        0      -  ex0
> > >127                127.0.0.1          UGRS        0        0  33220  lo0
> > >127.0.0.1          127.0.0.1          UH          1        2  33220  lo0
> > ># route add -host -iface 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.1
> > >add host 10.0.0.2: gateway 10.0.0.1
> > >
> > >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >This last step appears to be a regression from 1.5 as on that version
> > >the route is added automatically by the kernel.
> > 
> > 	the host route gets installed ok for me on -current.  i guess this is
> > 	due to the fact you have 10.0.0.0/8 assigned to your ex0 interface
> > 	already.  try another number (like 20.0.0.1 20.0.0.2) on gif0 and
> > 	see what happens.
> 
> Yes, I chose addresses on the same subnet to show the behaviour.
> in_addprefix() is always masking against the netmask, even for RTF_HOST.
> This doesn't seem right.  Please see the previous diff.
> 
> -seanb