Subject: Re: problem with promiscous mode and vlans
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 03/20/2003 01:32:17
In article <E15A8C18-5A72-11D7-B338-000A957650EC@wasabisystems.com>,
Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 11:25 AM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>> I've gone with solution b), but using one of the M_LINK flag instead of
>> burning a new one (there's only one byte left in m_flags).
>> See attached patch
>> comments ?
>I actually have a local patch which bumps the m_flags field to an int,
>because I needed to make some custom changes to the socket code, which
>required a few extra mbuf flags.
>I'll merge in the bits that widen the field (and shuffle the mbuf
>header accordingly) and ride the kernel version bump resulting from the
>new PID allocation code.
Sounds good to me.