Subject: Re: problem with promiscous mode and vlans
To: None <>
From: Christos Zoulas <>
List: tech-net
Date: 03/20/2003 01:32:17
In article <>,
Jason Thorpe <> wrote:
>On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 11:25  AM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>> I've gone with solution b), but using one of the M_LINK flag instead of
>> burning a new one (there's only one byte left in m_flags).
>> See attached patch
>> comments ?
>I actually have a local patch which bumps the m_flags field to an int, 
>because I needed to make some custom changes to the socket code, which 
>required a few extra mbuf flags.
>I'll merge in the bits that widen the field (and shuffle the mbuf 
>header accordingly) and ride the kernel version bump resulting from the 
>new PID allocation code.

Sounds good to me.