Subject: Re: problem with promiscous mode and vlans
To: Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/19/2003 18:25:48
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 11:25 AM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> I've gone with solution b), but using one of the M_LINK flag instead of
> burning a new one (there's only one byte left in m_flags).
> See attached patch
> comments ?
I actually have a local patch which bumps the m_flags field to an int,
because I needed to make some custom changes to the socket code, which
required a few extra mbuf flags.
I'll merge in the bits that widen the field (and shuffle the mbuf
header accordingly) and ride the kernel version bump resulting from the
new PID allocation code.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>