Subject: Re: synchronous ip_id
To: Perry E. Metzger <email@example.com>
From: Henry B. Hotz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/02/2003 19:14:36
At 10:37 AM -0500 2/26/03, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>Ignatios Souvatzis <email@example.com> writes:
>> > Not necessarily - that's why the +1.
>> > |---high bit 0---||---highi bit 1---||---high bit 0---|
>> > If the last value of the first "high bit 0" equals the first value of
>> > the second "high bit 0", it's just generated a duplicate, 2^15+1 from
>> > the first copy to the second.
>> err, right. Stupid me.
>I thought we were generating an ergodic sequence here, in which case
>that isn't possible...
I think this qualifies as a sequence of ergodic sequences. The
behavior of the high bit doesn't qualify, and the individual
fixed-high-bit sequences have no guarantees w.r.t each other. The
2^15+1 repetition case is of course unlikely, just not guaranteed
Did that rather abstract response actually help?
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry.B.Hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or firstname.lastname@example.org