Subject: Re: illegal network routes and a ponderance
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 02/19/2003 09:18:49
> Why is this (having a route pointing to a gateway that's not on net
> for any interface) not supported, even if there is a route for this
> gateway pointing at another gateway which is on-net?
My guess is, because it does not match IP's routing model, so whoever
did the code either didn't consider it at all or didn't think it worth
supporting. However, I didn't write the code in question, so I don't
> I. e. could the routing table be searched recursively, until a
> directly-reachable gateway is found?
It could. But quite aside from what it does to the assumptions
underlying IP, how would you cut off infinite loops?
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML email@example.com
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B