Subject: Re: Routing issue (no route to default host)
To: Anthony Lieuallen <>
From: Seth Kurtzberg <>
List: tech-net
Date: 02/13/2003 10:42:29
I suspect that the core problem here is that 10.x.x.x is a private address.  
Thus netbsd is doing what it is supposed to do; to wit, not routing packets 
pointed at a private address.

You could make a fairly trivial change to the network stack code and remove 
10.x.x.x from the list of private addresses.

On Thursday 13 February 2003 07:43 am, Anthony Lieuallen wrote:
> I started this topic in netbsd-help, and I apologize if this is not the
> correct area to ask this question, but no one there was able to provide
> me with a working solution.
> Situation is the cable modem service here.  All that is available is a
> "one-way" cable modem (asynchronus, cable downlink, analog phone modem
> uplink), and the strange way the cable modem's hardware seems to
> operate.  It assigns me a public address of, while the
> default router is at .  In short, I am never able to add a
> route to that address, as there is no route to the 10.x.x.x subnet.  As
> I posted to netbsd-help, I was able to solve this problem in linux
> (using the floppy disk based LRP) by issuing the command "ip route add
> dev eth0" prior to attempting to designate that as the
> default router.  I have been unable to locate an equivalent command for
> NetBSD.
> So as of now I am working off a linux router, without the services I
> had been using at my college apartment for over a year I was used to,
> including using this junky webmail service instead of my own email
> server ;-)  I have to reboot that machine to test out commands in
> NetBSD as well as cutting the entire house off from the internet so I
> sometimes wait a bit, but if anyone has any idea how to solve this
> problem I would much appreciate anything you could offer.
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day

Seth Kurtzberg
M. I. S. Corp.