Subject: Re: Routing issue (no route to default host)
To: Anthony Lieuallen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Seth Kurtzberg <email@example.com>
Date: 02/13/2003 10:42:29
I suspect that the core problem here is that 10.x.x.x is a private address.
Thus netbsd is doing what it is supposed to do; to wit, not routing packets
pointed at a private address.
You could make a fairly trivial change to the network stack code and remove
10.x.x.x from the list of private addresses.
On Thursday 13 February 2003 07:43 am, Anthony Lieuallen wrote:
> I started this topic in netbsd-help, and I apologize if this is not the
> correct area to ask this question, but no one there was able to provide
> me with a working solution.
> Situation is the cable modem service here. All that is available is a
> "one-way" cable modem (asynchronus, cable downlink, analog phone modem
> uplink), and the strange way the cable modem's hardware seems to
> operate. It assigns me a public address of 220.127.116.11, while the
> default router is at 10.17.44.244 . In short, I am never able to add a
> route to that address, as there is no route to the 10.x.x.x subnet. As
> I posted to netbsd-help, I was able to solve this problem in linux
> (using the floppy disk based LRP) by issuing the command "ip route add
> 10.17.44.244 dev eth0" prior to attempting to designate that as the
> default router. I have been unable to locate an equivalent command for
> So as of now I am working off a linux router, without the services I
> had been using at my college apartment for over a year I was used to,
> including using this junky webmail service instead of my own email
> server ;-) I have to reboot that machine to test out commands in
> NetBSD as well as cutting the entire house off from the internet so I
> sometimes wait a bit, but if anyone has any idea how to solve this
> problem I would much appreciate anything you could offer.
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
M. I. S. Corp.