Subject: Re: strange routing behavior: wrong route picked
To: Tad Hunt <>
From: None <>
List: tech-net
Date: 11/06/2002 10:30:59
>I've attached what I think is the relevant output below.
>Notice the route for, which should be reachable via
>interface tun8.  For some reason that I cannot fathom, "route get
>" tells me that it's using the default route out the
>"fe0" interface, instead of the the more specific route (which
>appears to be marked UP) as far as I can tell.

	any differences if you add "-host" or "-netmask"?
	% route -n get -host
	% route -n get -netmask 0xffffffff