Subject: Re: no v4, slip this time
To: <>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-net
Date: 07/17/2002 10:39:22
--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 04:39:35PM +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
> >That is precisely what I intend to fix, and if anyone else had done
> >likewise, I wnated to at least consider doing it compatibly.
> >Fortunately, it can be done in a way compatible with old (v4-only)
> >implementations for v4 traffic.
>=20
> 	ietf@ietf would be the most correct forum to ask about it, though
> 	expect a lot of pushbacks from PPP guys.  i bet you will attach
> 	ethernet protocol type # (0x0800 for IP).  hope to see your patch
> 	sooner!

Now, this wouldn't be compatible - would it?

	-is

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBPTUtHzCn4om+4LhpAQFyJgf/Vbt0n09BvoZXHlcZb3YGk1x3CbuACuzS
IGC1QMDhx0CS2bL3GwG2SISDXNKSCZyW5/C44SphcfrVrz1GuP8ZalGnI5sDAwRy
bdA/HFSFWA//eUBgTzdu7zaTcwCuwV5EKESQs2odaSJeCz+HOCRu04KoRf7ss58Q
KKQyxScm2ZLs2akexLEhQMIHSzgSbgv0htHgs0xfEFoEprytnjvgjYvDUHb5jOvD
XrrlHAS96Tc5th3Gz5DwIB0qwNcIfB2Xtj8yCwI+ok/MusfYB7kJ7VRGrdg5bkPZ
m0nUCAWVKSQxZASgjPJA/c/KxFkRTwq2YZ/9L+wtKwj/3ZdW0L+22w==
=1xRL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2--